L4 1997		L4 1998

<Pv>		  31.95		  31.70
<Pt0>		 140.41		 143.63 (138.9)
<Pq>		1719.83	(1647)	1797.09 (1600)
<Peff>		  98.90		  98.48

<Rv>		  37.34		  36.94
<Rt0>		 149.83		 148.39
<Rq>		1292.64		1361.48
<Reff>		  91.15		  91.40

-------------------------------------------------

		L5 1997		L5 1998

<sigP>		214		235
<P0eff>		 49.5 (48.7)	 43.0 (48.7)
<P1eff>		 53.9 (52.7)	 48.6 (48.0)
<P2eff>		 50.5 (50.9)	 38.7 (34.5)

<sigR>		204		223
<R0eff>		 79.2 (82.3)	 66.8 (69.6)
<R1eff>		 64.7 (66.2)	 53.7 (56.8)
<R2eff>		 44.8 (47.2)	 42.5 (43.0)

<tracks/ev>	 15.3 (16.8)	  7.5 (12.6)
<Phits/trk>	 12.3 (12.1)	 12.3 (12.4)
<Rhits/trk>	 14.4 (14.9)	 13.6 (13.9)
<Phitsused>	 22.5 		 19.3
<Rhitsused>	 17.5		 13.6


*() numbers in brackets are LOOK peakparm values

------------------------------------------------------

L4 measurements of t0 are suspect, but the database
value is within 1% for the data taken so far.

L4 Planar velocity is 0.8% lower
L5 Radial velocity is 1.1% lower

Absolute wire efficiencies are similar

Chambers efficiencies as calculated from segments on
tracks at L5 are all lower this year. In part this
could be due to the fact that the dead wire maps
were not updated for the early runs. However the data
from last week, since the database was updated, do not
show any obvious improvement.